The need for life insurance

Since September is life insurance awareness month, here a few thoughts on the need for life insurance.

Real life testimonials of life insurance beneficiaries are compelling.  Neil Frankle of the WealthPilgrim.com has a memorable personal story of being orphaned at 17 and unexpectedly receiving $25,000 in life insurance that his father inadvertently signed up for as a loan condition.

Yes, but aren’t the odds of dying before one’s time fairly rare?  Modern life is certainly not as prone to unexpected death as it was 100 years ago with tuberculosis, cholera, typhoid scarlet fever and pneumonia.   There was the flu pandemic of 1918 and another could conceivably happen.  The West Coast could see an earthquake on the order of magnitude as the San Francisco earthquake of 1906.

But in America today, on a day to day basis, the main risk to one’s life is in a car.  It’s routine to travel at speeds above 50 mph, trusting your life to drivers passing by who may be drunk, distracted, unskilled or infirm. Fatalities run around 33,000 a year in the US.   It’s possible to be another one, and entirely not your fault.

If you are raising children, get some life insurance.   Term is cheap.  Don’t let your kids down.

For example, Genworth, preferred non tobacco, 10 year term rates for men, $100,000 in coverage:

age 31 – $8.11 a month
age 36 – $8.37 a month
age 46 – $13.64 a month
age 51 – $19.68 a month

Genworth has $50,000 10 year term that’s even cheaper.   Woman’s rates are even less than for men.

Continue reading “The need for life insurance”

Permanent life insurance more suitable for seniors than term

Over the last few days, I compared life insurance websites for seniors in ages 60 through age 72 by Google searching life insurance and adding an age, “life insurance age 68”  for example.   It’s misleading for those in their 60’s and 70’s to see at the top of Google’s list websites with term life insurance given such prominence. Term is not usually the right product for seniors.  The primary purposes of term are to replace lost income or settle an outstanding debt like a mortgage.   Sure if you have less than 10 years to go on a mortgage, term life insurance might make sense.   I would surmise term gets promoted and sold simple because it’s less expensive.  But if one buys term in your 60’s or 70’s, chances are you will outlive your term, and then you’ve paid all that premium for nothing.  Even if you take the best term out there, Genworth, and have the option to convert to a fixed rate universal life, you have to pay higher premiums as your age goes up.

For the majority of people in their 60’s and 70’s permanent life insurance is the most suitable coverage.  If at all healthy, guaranteed universal life insurance is the best.  Coverage starts at a $25,000 benefit amount, and premiums are affordable.  North American has an excellent G-UL right now.   There are also small whole life policies, called simplified issue because there is only a short questionnaire and no blood term.  Coverage starts at a $2,000 a $3,000 benefit amount.   Either choice is better than term because it’s fixed rate coverage for life.